Re: pg_restore multiple --function options - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: pg_restore multiple --function options
Date
Msg-id 20130826201734.GD16776@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_restore multiple --function options  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Responses Re: pg_restore multiple --function options  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:29:06PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> While looking at the pg_restore code, I noticed that while it
> supports specifying multiple --table options to restore several
> tables, it does not support multiple --function options. Or --index,
> --schema, or --trigger.
> 
> The support for multiple --table options was added in 9.3, in
> January. See
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAK3UJRG+yV1mK5twLfKVMCwXH4f6PnJou6Rn=ecabyfQH1vVHg@mail.gmail.com.
> Was there a particular reason for only doing it for --table, or was
> it just an oversight or lack of interest? No doubt that --table is
> the most interesting one, but IMHO the other options should behave
> the same, for the sake of consistency.

+1 for making them consistent.  There will also be an improvement in
usability.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Improving avg performance for numeric
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: GetTransactionSnapshot() in enum.c