On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 10:57:56AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 06:59:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Does that ameliorate your concern, or do you still want it to be DEBUG1?
>
> > I think of the "implicit sequence" messages we moved from NOTICE to DEBUG1
> > somewhat recently. No doubt those messages had helped at times, but they
> > didn't quite carry their weight at NOTICE. My gut prediction is that this
> > will fall in that same utility range. But you make a valid point about noise
> > in the startup log being easier to discount.
>
> Well, we can certainly back off the messages' log level if we get
> complaints. But I think the argument for this patch being useful
> is a great deal stronger if it's allowed to operate by default.
True enough. Your plan makes sense to me now; thanks.
--
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
