On 2013-08-01 14:37:45 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Alvaro Herrera (alvherre@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> > Andres Freund wrote:
> >
> > > Postgresql.auto.conf.d is what I'd propose, but the decision about
> > > that seems to be one of the smaller problems around this feature...
> > > That naming seems to make it sensible to extend other files (hba,
> > > ident) similarly at a later point.
> >
> > I don't like this particular naming proposal, but I'm glad this patch
> > finally seems to be getting somewhere.
>
> Yeah, also not a fan. We don't have any 'conf.d' directories in PGDATA
> and I don't think we should start now. I liked Josh's suggestions of
> something like "system_conf". For multiple independent config files, we
> could use directories under that (eg: 'pgconf', 'pghba', 'pgident'..).
People know what to expect from .d directories, that's why I suggested
it, don't feel really strongly about it. I dislike naming the
subdirectories pgconf/... et al though, we should reference the original
files name, instead of introducing new abbreviations.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
