Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 14.05.2013 05:34, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >In the last two years, the first commit fest started in June, which is
> >about a month from now. If we are going to do that again, we should
> >clarify that as soon as possible. And if we are not, then we should
> >also clarify that, because some people are probably expecting that we
> >are.
> >
> >So, any thoughts on the commit fest schedule, any need for deviations,
> >or same old?
>
> Same old sounds good to me. We released 9.3beta1 at the same time
> this year that we released 9.2beta1 last year. I've been quite happy
> with the 9.3 schedule. There are a few items on the 9.3 Open Items
> list, but I would expect them to be resolved in the next week or
> two, so that barring any major new issues, we could release 9.3beta2
> at the end of May, like we released 9.2beta2 last year.
Uhm. If I've been anything wrt the 9.3 schedule, happy is not it. We
completely failed to manage it in any kind of sane way. I vote +1 for
keeping the same commitfest schedule this year, but please let's do
everyone a favor and make sure we get some more (stricter?) management
of the commitfests this time. Not closing the November commitfest in
March would be appreciated, I think.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
