Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Michael Meskes
Subject Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions
Date
Msg-id 20130403120139.GA15898@feivel.credativ.lan
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 07:52:33AM -0400, Dave Page wrote:
> Even if you put that aside though, there are nearly 300
> support/services companies in our directory, most of whom are likely
> to be unknown to the majority of us. Obviously there's no way we would
> include all of them on the -packagers list, so how do we decide
> fairly?

Yep, that's the tricky point. And we may run into the same problem DBaaS when
more companies offer a hosted PostgreSQL version.

> > So then it's a matter of users? What is the number of user one has to have to
> > qualify? How do we count users? Installations, db admins, real database users
> > as in customers?
>
> Yes, that is what needs debate. I don't know how we can write down
> specific criteria. I do know that when we tried to do something
> similar to define who goes on the sponsors page, we got nowhere at all
> because it's *really* hard to write such rules, without almost
> immediately finding some exception that we'd have to make.

True.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: The PostgreSQL homepage and release announcements