On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:31:51PM +0100, anarazel@anarazel.de wrote:
>
>
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> schrieb:
>
> >Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> >> Should I just patch pg_upgrade to remove the "indisvalid", skip
> >> "indisvalid" indexes, and backpatch it? Users should be using the
> >> version of pg_upgrade to match new pg_dump. Is there any case where
> >> they don't match? Do I still need to check for "indisready"?
> >
> >Yeah, if you can just ignore !indisvalid indexes that should work fine.
> >I see no need to look at indisready if you're doing that.
>
> You need to look at inisready in 9.2 since thats used for about to be dropped indexes. No?
Well, if it is dropped, pg_dump will not dump it. At this point though,
pg_upgrade is either running in check mode, or it is the only user. I
think we are OK.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
