Re: Re: Doc patch making firm recommendation for setting the value of commit_delay - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Re: Doc patch making firm recommendation for setting the value of commit_delay
Date
Msg-id 20130318190724.GE16641@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Doc patch making firm recommendation for setting the value of commit_delay  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 05:47:30PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
> > I'm marking this patch Ready for Committer, qualified with a recommendation to
> > adopt only the wal.sgml changes.
> 
> I've committed this along with some further wordsmithing.  I kept
> Peter's change to pg_test_fsync's default -s value; I've always felt
> that 2 seconds was laughably small.  It might be all right for very
> quick-and-dirty tests, but as a default value, it seems like a poor
> choice, because it's at the very bottom of the credible range of
> choices.

Agreed, 2 seconds was at the bottom.  The old behavior was very slow so
I went low.  Now that we are using it, 5 secs makes sense.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Enabling Checksums
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Enabling Checksums