On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 05:08:26PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Another point worth considering is that most of this is duplicated by
> ecpg's libpgtypes. Do we want to fix that one too, or do we just let it
> continue to be broken? I note that other bugs are already unfixed in
> ecpg's copy. One other idea to consider is moving these things to
Meaning that a fix wasn't put there, too?
> But in light of this bug and other already fixed date/time bugs, perhaps
> it's warranted? Opinions please.
I'd love to go to a single source. Most of libpgtypes was taken from the
backend back when it was developed.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
