Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> On 02/12/2013 11:19 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >> Mind you, if the list needs modification *anyway*, is there something
> >> wrong with using ArizonaPUG@postgresql.org?
> >
> > That seems a reasonable compromise.
>
> yeah - I don't think we should use azpug@ for arizona and shadow an
> entire country so I would thing that arizonapug@ seems like a sensible
> alternative
And how about US-Ariz-pug? The ISO code for Arizona is US-AZ; we could
do that too.
I want something that has gotten at least *some* discussion, thought,
and agreement, not the first thing that crosses our minds. It's a name
that we're going to be stuck with for a long time, because it's damn
hard to change list names. I note none of the guys from AZ have
actually said anything.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
