On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:34:26AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> OK, I have looked at this and it seems perfectly sane. In fact, after a
> very frustrating time VS2012 is the *only* way I have found to get a 64
> bit build using MS tools on Windows 8. Given that, I propose to backport
> these changes to 9.2 so we can get some buildfarm coverage of that tool
> chain that includes the latest stable release.
Thanks for reviewing. A backpatch seems adequately low-risk to me.
