Re: CommitFest 2012-11 Progress - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: CommitFest 2012-11 Progress
Date
Msg-id 20121208163408.GC24326@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to CommitFest 2012-11 Progress  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: CommitFest 2012-11 Progress  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Noah,

On 2012-12-08 09:06:01 -0500, Noah Misch wrote:
> We're entering the last planned week of the CF.  Apart from a 72-hour period
> in mid-November, some CF has remained in-progress continuously for the last
> 176 days.  With 64 out of the 82 current patches unresolved, we're on track to
> again see no gap between CF 2012-11 and CF 2013-01.  The process as practiced
> today is a shell of its former self[1][2].  Authors, reviewers, committers:
> has the process changed to something better, worthy of formally replacing its
> predecessor?  Or, rather, do we need a fresh process correction?

I agree that lately there seems to be minimal benefit of the commitfest
process. I don't see many disadvantages either, but...

No idea how to fix that, it seems most people are simply swamped with
work and stuff.

I made a pass through most of the commitfest entries to update their
state to something sensible and where it seemed necessary inquired the
newest status.
Not sure thats really welcome, but it was the only thing I could think
of helping to make some progress.


Greetings,

Andres Freund

--Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: review: pgbench - aggregation of info written into log
Next
From: Boszormenyi Zoltan
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework