CommitFest 2012-11 Progress - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject CommitFest 2012-11 Progress
Date
Msg-id 20121208140601.GB27495@tornado.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: CommitFest 2012-11 Progress  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
We're entering the last planned week of the CF.  Apart from a 72-hour period
in mid-November, some CF has remained in-progress continuously for the last
176 days.  With 64 out of the 82 current patches unresolved, we're on track to
again see no gap between CF 2012-11 and CF 2013-01.  The process as practiced
today is a shell of its former self[1][2].  Authors, reviewers, committers:
has the process changed to something better, worthy of formally replacing its
predecessor?  Or, rather, do we need a fresh process correction?

Thanks,
nm

[1] http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CommitFest
[2] http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Running_a_CommitFest



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Phil Sorber
Date:
Subject: Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: optimized DROP of multiple tables within a transaction