On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:34:36PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:46:33AM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> >> So, the way I understand it, in Oracle terms, this feature is a
> >> "snapshot", not a materialized view. Maybe that's what it should
> >> be called then.
> >
> > "Snapshot" is one of the options for refreshing an Oracle
> > materialized view. There are others, which we'll eventually add
> > if past is any prologue :)
>
> That's the way I understand it, too.
Great :)
> > I hate to add to the bike-shedding, but we should probably add
> > REFRESH SNAPSHOT as an optional piece of the grammar, with more
> > REFRESH options to come.
>
> I would prefer to leave the syntax for refreshing MVs to a later
> patch. I'm kind of assuming that SNAPSHOT would be the default if
> no other options are specified, but I would prefer not to get into
> too much speculation about add-on patches for fear of derailing
> this initial effort.
You're right. I withdraw my suggestion until such time as this patch
(or descendent) is committed and actual working code implementing
other refresh strategies is written.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
