Re: New statistics for WAL buffer dirty writes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: New statistics for WAL buffer dirty writes
Date
Msg-id 20121023161253.GI4971@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New statistics for WAL buffer dirty writes  (Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga@uptime.jp>)
Responses Re: New statistics for WAL buffer dirty writes  (Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga@uptime.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Satoshi Nagayasu escribió:

> With this patch, walwriter process and each backend process
> would sum up dirty writes, and send it to the stat collector.
> So, the value could be saved in the stat file, and could be
> kept on restarting.
>
> The statistics could be retreive with using
> pg_stat_get_xlog_dirty_writes() function, and could be reset
> with calling pg_stat_reset_shared('walwriter').
>
> Now, I have one concern.
>
> The reset time could be captured in globalStats.stat_reset_timestamp,
> but this value is the same with the bgwriter one.
>
> So, once pg_stat_reset_shared('walwriter') is called,
> stats_reset column in pg_stat_bgwriter does represent
> the reset time for walwriter, not for bgwriter.
>
> How should we handle this?  Should we split this value?
> And should we have new system view for walwriter?

I think the answer to the two last questions is yes.  It doesn't seem to
make sense, to me, to have a single reset timings for what are
effectively two separate things.

Please submit an updated patch to next CF.  I'm marking this one
returned with feedback.  Thanks.

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: too much pgbench init output
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: too much pgbench init output