Re: September 2012 commitfest - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: September 2012 commitfest
Date
Msg-id 20121010161704.GD9594@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: September 2012 commitfest  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: September 2012 commitfest  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > The commitfest currently in progress seems to have ground to a halt.
>
> Indeed :-(.  I plead guilty as much as anybody else to not making it
> a high priority.  But do we even have anyone acting as commitfest
> manager?  Periodic nagging seems to be necessary to move things forward.

Yeah.  Apparently we don't so this is my first attempt.

> > Patches in "Ready for committer" state:
> > * Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys
> > * Updatable views
> > * plpgsql_check_function
> > * parallel pg_dump
> > * embedded list interface
> > * Move postgresql_fdw_validator into dblink
>
> I have fairly strong opinions about the first three, and will endeavor
> to work on them next.

Excellent, thanks.

> IIRC, the parallel pg_dump one is said to need review by a Windows
> expert, which is not me, so I've not looked at it.

Andrew?  Magnus?

> I'm not sure that the embedded list one can honestly be said to be ready
> for commit considering the lack of consensus on it, but we seem to be
> making some progress anyway.

I posted an updated version this morning.

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Extend argument of OAT_POST_CREATE
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes