Re: [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes
Date
Msg-id 20121010154447.GB9594@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes  (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>)
Responses Re: [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes  (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Kohei KaiGai wrote:
> 2012/9/5 Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>:

> > Looking at SEPgsql testing is on my long TODO list. I'll have to set up a
> > separate VM for it, as I don't habitually run SELinux.
> >
> If you are available to provide a VM environment for sepgsql, let me help
> set up its build and regression test environment.
>
> As you may know, the regression test of sepgsql requires some additional
> configurations on operating system level, such as security policy load and
> so on. I expect we have to add something special stuff onto the buildfirm
> system.

Did this go anywhere?


--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #7534: walreceiver takes long time to detect n/w breakdown
Next
From: Christopher Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: Truncate if exists