On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:17:25 -0700, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> 1. We probably don't want the SQL syntax to be added to the
> grammar. This should be written as an extension, using custom
> functions as the API, instead of extra SQL syntax.
I can't find the discussion about this, have any pointer ?
I've found a patch of 2007 by Gavin Sherry implementing the SQL 2003
TABLESAMPLE syntax. May be a good starting point ?
http://www.neilconway.org/talks/hacking/
--strk;
,------o-. | __/ | Delivering high quality PostGIS 2.0 ! | / 2.0 | http://strk.keybit.net -
http://vizzuality.com`-o------'
