Re: ECPG FETCH readahead - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: ECPG FETCH readahead
Date
Msg-id 20120410143722.GC6129@tornado.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ECPG FETCH readahead  (Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: ECPG FETCH readahead  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:35:21AM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> So, it's established that a specified READAHEAD N should not
> be overridden. Even an explicit READAHEAD 1.
>
> Only a non-decorated cursor can be overridden, even if
> a different default readahead window size is specified with
> e.g. "ecpg -R 8". If ECPGFETCHSZ is not present, 8 will be used,
> if ECPGFETCHSZ is present, its value will be used. ECPGopen()
> will need an extra bool argument to distinguish this.
>
> Is this acceptable? Noah, Michael?

Sounds perfect.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application