Le Thu, 8 Dec 2011 16:27:56 +0000,
"Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA)" <bnicholson@hp.com> a écrit :
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Marc Cousin <cousinmarc@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > I wish it was the same (I use and like both pgbouncer and pgpool
> > too, and they do a good job, I'm not arguing on that). But
> > unfortunately it isn't: you still have the notion of session for
> > each connected client in Oracle when using the shared servers model.
> >
> > It means you keep your session variables, your prepared statements,
> > your running transaction, etc… in each individual session while
> > having the multiplexing equivalent of a 'statement level' from
> > pgbouncer.
>
> In Oracle - can the pool share connections between DB users and/or
> databases on the instance? If the answer is yes to either, that is a
> fair bit better than what we can achieve today.
Between users yes. But there is only one DB per instance in Oracle :)
