Re: pgsql: Do missed autoheader run for previous commit. - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pgsql: Do missed autoheader run for previous commit.
Date
Msg-id 201111212008.pALK8Xw14292@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: Do missed autoheader run for previous commit.  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-committers
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie nov 18 11:12:32 -0300 2011:
> >
> > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie nov 18 00:39:42 -0300 2011:
> > >> Do missed autoheader run for previous commit.
> >
> > > Hmm, does the win32 file need updating too?
> >
> > I don't see HAVE_SCANDIR in there, do you?
>
> Well, I wonder if the win32 file needs to be hooked to the whole
> autoconf/autoheader thing somehow.  I mean, if HAVE_SCANDIR wasn't
> there, does this mean that when it was added to pg_config.h we forgot to
> update the win32 copy?

Well, Win32 doesn't have HAVE_SCANDIR, so it didn't need to be defined, I
think.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Fix citext upgrade script to update derived copies of pg_type.ty
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: pgsql: More code review for rangetypes patch.