Re: Large C files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: Large C files
Date
Msg-id 20111017060019.GD15692@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Large C files  (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Large C files  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 07:36:32PM +0100, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> This evening, David Fetter described a problem to me that he was
> having building the Twitter FDW. It transpired that it was down to its
> dependence on an #include that was recently judged to be
> redundant.This seems like another reason to avoid using pgrminclude -
> even if we can be certain that the #includes are redundant within
> Postgres, we cannot be sure that they are redundant in third party
> code.

Perhaps something that tested some third-party code
automatically...say, doesn't the new buildfarm stuff allow running
some arbitrary code?

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_comments (was: Allow \dd to show constraint comments)
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby