Re: Overhead cost of Serializable Snapshot Isolation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Overhead cost of Serializable Snapshot Isolation
Date
Msg-id 201110112145.p9BLjiL15445@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Overhead cost of Serializable Snapshot Isolation  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org> wrote:
> 
> > That experience has taught me that backwards compatibility, while very
> > important in a lot of cases, has the potential to do just as much harm
> > if overdone.
> 
> Agreed. Does my suggestion represent overdoing it? I ask for balance,
> not an extreme.

Well, balance is looking at what everyone else in the group is
suggesting, and realizing you might not have all the answers, and
listening.  As far as I can see, you are the _only_ one who thinks it
needs an option.  In that light, your suggestion seems extreme, not
balanced.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Steve Singer
Date:
Subject: Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers