Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> Hmm, so you included walsender.h into xlog.h? That seems a bit funny
> >> considering that walsender.h already includes xlog.h. It seems the
> >> reason for this is only the AllowCascadeReplication() definition. Maybe
> >> that should go elsewhere instead, for example walsender.h?
>
> > Moved to walsender.h. Thanks.
>
> You seem to have entirely missed the point of Alvaro's remark, which is
> that you've got xlog.h including walsender.h (still) as well as
> walsender.h including xlog.h. That's broken.
Oh, OK, done. xlog.h removed from walsender.h and tested.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
