Re: collation problem on 9.1-beta1 - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: collation problem on 9.1-beta1
Date
Msg-id 201106100324.p5A3OaI23221@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: collation problem on 9.1-beta1  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> > On tor, 2011-06-09 at 13:30 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Column numbers in ORDER BY is ANSI syntax so I don't think calling
> >> them "legacy" is accurate. ?"limited functionality"?
> >
> > It was in SQL 92, but removed in 99, so it's technically no longer part
> > of the standard.

Wow, they removed it;  I use it all the time.

> It's still extremely widely used though, I think, and very useful.  I
> don't feel we have to support GROUP BY 1 COLLATE whatever, but it
> might be worth the trouble to at least emit a decent HINT.

True.  Seems now these numbers are PG extensions!

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
Date:
Subject: Fwd: Difference in postgres9.0.4 and postgres9.1beta1 when displaying error lines in functions with comments
Next
From: Denis de Bernardy
Date:
Subject: expanded mode + wrapping in psql