On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 09:36:00AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> > On 05/31/2011 06:41 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> We already have a search system that works reasonably well for the archives...
>
> > I trust this weas a piece of sarcasm. I spoke to more than a few people
> > at pgcon and nobody had a good word to say about the search system on
> > the archives.
>
> Please note, though, that there is no bug tracker anywhere whose search
> mechanism doesn't suck as much or more. If you're unhappy with the
> search stuff the solution is to improve it, not bring in another bad
> mechanism.
>
+1
Ken
