-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:39:47AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
[...]
> Review of design concepts and WIP patches has *always* been a problem
> for this project [...]
> We tell people to submit a design concept, but then such submissions are
> often ignored. When they're not ignored, they often are subject to
> either extreme bikeshedding or a lot of negativity around things the
> author hasn't implemented yet ... even if the author warns that they're
> not implemented.
I'm not a committer. So take this data point for what it's worth. But I
have been following this list for quite a while, and I must say: I (very
respectfully!) disagree. Having watched mailing lists for other
projects, the quality of the answers one gets here is outstanding. The
tone might be sometimes a bit tight (but never disrespectful or
flaming), but seriously: what do I get off a friendly answer if there is
no content?
The same goes to -GENERAL. I've always got answers to my (sometimes, in
hindsight quite stupid) questions which actually *helped* to solve my
problem.
It's OK to strive to improve the process, but I think you all are quite
good.
[...]
> So in the spirit of NOT reinventing the wheel: ReviewBoard. Yes,
> really [...]
> [...] But I think it's time to try something else, maybe
> several other things.
Maybe. But I *do* understand the unwillingness to change that. I've
contributed (tiny) patches to more that one project, and it's
frustrating to fight the bug-tracker-du-jour system. This one won't talk
to me unless my browser talks Javascript. That one... (you get the
idea). I strongly appreciate the free-flowing mailing list style here
(maybe it's just an age problem ;-)
Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFNr9IhBcgs9XrR2kYRAkw+AJoDFJcnpR06VpGNVAzsbx/eZpQcxACfUv//
vFsZsPiYlM78fxsjCLQvbHw=
=A+7H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
