On Sunday 27. of February 2011 23:50:17 Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On sön, 2011-02-27 at 21:19 +0100, Rumko wrote:
> > The attached patch (also available at
> > http://www.rumko.net/0001-DragonFly-BSD-support.patch ) applies cleanly
> > to the master branch and can be cherry-picked to REL9_0_STABLE branch
> > without conflicts.
>
> It seems to me that it would be easier to just map dragonfly to the
> freebsd template.
I didn't see a precedence for that kind of introduction of a new platform (all
others seem to have their own templates), so thought it would've had less
chance of being accepted.
Is it preferable to have it linked instead of having it separate like in the
current patch?
--
Regards,
Rumko
