Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> >> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>> remove tags.
> >
> >> Sorry, vague commit message (I forgot squash).
> >
> >> Can I will use git ammend to improve this message?
>
> Absolutely not.
>
> > How about git revert, instead? ?It's not apparent to me that these
> > changes were improvements.
>
> I'll buy that one.
[ CC to docs, committers removed. ]
Well, if we want to revert, then we have to add <literal> to all the
numbers used in our docs --- there was no logic in what we previously
had. Do we want that?
Here is an example line I did not change:
an otherwise idle connection. A value of 0 uses the system default.
Do we want that 0 to appear in a fixed-width font via <literal>?
It is easy to do but we should decide.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
