Re: test_fsync label adjustments - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: test_fsync label adjustments
Date
Msg-id 201101182303.p0IN3Ol08867@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: test_fsync label adjustments  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: test_fsync label adjustments
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > I have modified test_fsync to use test labels that match wal_sync_method
> > values, and and added more tests for open_sync with different sizes. 
> 
> Given that it was unclear whether the first such test was of any value,
> why are you slowing down the program by adding more?

Greg Smith indicated it has value, so I made it more complete.  No?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: test_fsync label adjustments
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixing GIN for empty/null/full-scan cases