On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:19:23AM +0100, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> > One could imagine that an extension was updated more quickly than
> > PostgreSQL major versions come out, or at least not at the exact same
> > time.
>
> Sure, but I don't see what your proposed syntax is giving us here.
The syntax by itself does nothing, but the underlying capability gives
users:
- The ability to have versions of software on different databases on the same system.
- The ability to do deterministic upgrades, rather than just, "upgrade me to the latest, which may be buggy and/or slow
thingsdown to avoid a problem I know I don't have."
> Currently the new version you're upgraded to is the one installed on
> the file system, and whose .so has already been upgraded, and that's
> it.
>
> I still need a better grasp at what your proposal is about to
> comment and integrate, I fear.
I am not saying that this is a show-stopper. I *am* saying that
multiple concurrent versions and deterministic upgrades are common
enough requests that you shouldn't do things that would prevent those
in the future.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
