Re: Git conversion status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Git conversion status
Date
Msg-id 201009222347.o8MNlCj02992@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Git conversion status  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> > <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> >> As far as I can see, I need to go to the master clone, run a checkout
> >> and pull on each branch, and *then* a pull on the local clone updates to
> >> the latest head on that branch. �It is not enough to pull when the
> >> master branch is checked out.
> 
> > Ah, crap.  You're right.  Sucktastic.
> 
> As far as I can tell so far, the multiple-workdir setup dominates all
> the others in terms of minimizing the amount of "git pull" monkeywork.

Yes, that is what I am using too.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: fazool mein
Date:
Subject: Re: Shutting down server from a backend process, e.g. walrceiver
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Configuring synchronous replication