Re: is syntax columname(tablename) necessary still? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: is syntax columname(tablename) necessary still?
Date
Msg-id 20100809130256.GA11439@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to is syntax columname(tablename) necessary still?  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: is syntax columname(tablename) necessary still?
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 12:18:33PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hello
> 
> I am working on Grouping Sets support. The first issue is "cube"
> keyword. Contrib module "cube" define a few functions "cube". So if we
> want to continue in support this function, then "cube" have to be a
> unreserved keyword.

The "cube" contrib module was only ever meant to be replaced by the
real feature, which you're working on, so +1 for dropping everything
in it that you are not replacing with the one which complies with the
SQL standard.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: MERGE Specification
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: more personal copyrights