Re: Poor Yum User Download Experience - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Poor Yum User Download Experience
Date
Msg-id 201006301442.o5UEgDM17445@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Poor Yum User Download Experience  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: Poor Yum User Download Experience  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Poor Yum User Download Experience  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-www
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I've certainly had reports from actual download users, and passed
> those along. I think I've done it in private email to JD, so I'm just
> confirming here that yes, we've seen those complaints from actual
> users.

OK, so that means Command Prompt is not willing to correct problem
reports in a reasonable amount of time.  I guess we, as a community,
either have to accept that or find another RPM/YUM supplier.

We don't attribute these packages to Command Prompt like we do for other
items on that page:
http://www.postgresql.org/download/linux

Should we do that, and would that help us avoid receiving problem
reports ourselves?

It is also confusing that that section mixes links to Command Prompt and
Devrim packages.

Please tell me our other download sections are also not such a huge
mess.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + None of us is going to be here forever. +


pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Poor Yum User Download Experience
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Poor Yum User Download Experience