Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 15:35, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
> <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote:
> > Robert Haas wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
> >> <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I for myself would be rather annoyed if we started quoting all column
> >>> names
> >>> in our dumps. This is seriously hampering readability and while it is
> >>> already annoying that pg_dump output is slightly different from the
> >>> original
> >>> DDL used this would make it far worse.
> >>
> >> It's only been proposed to make it an option, not to shove it down
> >> anyone's throat.
> >
> > that will pretty much defeat the purpose for most use cases i guess because
> > people will dump with the defaults and only discover the problem after the
> > fact.
>
> Well, if you dump in custom format, it could be useful to be able to
> do this on pg_restore time. Not having followed this thread in detail,
> but would that work? That would be a much more useful option...
I don't think so because much of the quoting has to be done in the
backend, and it would be hard for pg_dump to munge the dump file before
sending it to the backend --- it doesn't have enough knowledge, I am
afraid. It could try targeting just new keywords, but I am worried that
would cause more problems than it fixes.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ None of us is going to be here forever. +
