Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: why do we have rd_istemp? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: why do we have rd_istemp?
Date
Msg-id 201005312003.o4VK3vq16767@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: why do we have rd_istemp?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: why do we have rd_istemp?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > Given "Relation rel", it looks to me like rel->rd_rel->relistemp will
> > always give the same answer as rel->rd_istemp.  So why have both?
> 
> Might be historical --- relistemp is pretty new.

Is this a TODO or something we want to clean up?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + None of us is going to be here forever. +

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: improve plpgsql's EXECUTE 'select into' message with a hint
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: bitmap-index-scan faster than seq-scan on full-table-scan (gin index)