Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Date
Msg-id 201005081848.o48Imak02225@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote:
> With a plugin option, I would not object to option 1.
> 
> If option 1 was taken, without plugins, it's clear that would be against
> consensus.
> 
> Having said that, I'll confirm now there will not be an extreme reaction
> from me if option (1) was forced, nor do I counsel that from others.

I found this email amusing. You phrase it like the community is supposed
to be worried by an objection from you or an "extreme reaction";  I
certainly am not.  You have been in the community long enough to not use
such phrasing.  This is not the first time I have complained about this.
I have no idea why an objection from you should mean more than an
objection from anyone else in the community, and I have no idea what an
"extreme reaction" means, or why anyone should care.  Do you think the
community is negotiting with you?

I think the concensus is to change this setting to a boolean.  If you
don't want to do it, I am sure we can find someone who will.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: hernan gonzalez
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] psql weird behaviour with charset encodings
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful