Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Date
Msg-id 1273394491.3936.512.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 14:48 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I think the consensus is to change this setting to a boolean.  If you
> don't want to do it, I am sure we can find someone who will.

You expect others to act on consensus and follow rules, yet ignore them
yourself when it suits your purpose. Your other points seem designed to
distract people from seeing that.

There is clear agreement that a problem exists. The action to take as a
result of that problem is very clearly in doubt and yet you repeatedly
ignore other people's comments and viable technical resolutions. If you
can find a cat's paw to break consensus for you, more fool them. You
might find someone with a good resolution, if you ask that instead.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Next
From: Ian Barwick
Date:
Subject: 9.0b1: "ERROR: btree index keys must be ordered by attribute"