Re: pl/java status - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pl/java status
Date
Msg-id 201004150253.o3F2rf609617@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pl/java status  (Damian Carey <jamianb@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pl/java status  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: pl/java status  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
Damian Carey wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 6:18 AM, John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com> wrote:
> > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>
> >> Mostly, I think you will find that the back end developers aren't fond
> >> of Java and thus, it doesn't get much love.
> >>
> >> There is a reason that plPerl is king in this community (and I don't
> >> even like Perl).
> >>
> >
>
> Java2perl anyone ?
> http://search.cpan.org/~philcrow/Java-Javap-0.04/bin/java2perl6
> (99% joking)
>
> And if you think positively a 14hour TZ difference is really only 10
> if you go the other way.

Is PL/J still being developed?  I can't find it myself, but was curious.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: raghavendra t
Date:
Subject: Re: VACUUM process running for a long time
Next
From: gvim
Date:
Subject: Inconsistent SQL errors