Re: pl/java status - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: pl/java status
Date
Msg-id 1271349566.21263.31.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pl/java status  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 22:53 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Damian Carey wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 6:18 AM, John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com> wrote:
> > > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Mostly, I think you will find that the back end developers aren't fond
> > >> of Java and thus, it doesn't get much love.
> > >>
> > >> There is a reason that plPerl is king in this community (and I don't
> > >> even like Perl).
> > >>
> > >
> >
> > Java2perl anyone ?
> > http://search.cpan.org/~philcrow/Java-Javap-0.04/bin/java2perl6
> > (99% joking)
> >
> > And if you think positively a 14hour TZ difference is really only 10
> > if you go the other way.
>
> Is PL/J still being developed?  I can't find it myself, but was curious.

Not as far as I know.

>
> --
>   Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
>   EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com
>


--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: When is an explicit cast necessary?
Next
From: John R Pierce
Date:
Subject: solaris tarballs and pl/java