Re: INSERT INTO...RETURNING vs SELECT - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Andreas Kretschmer
Subject Re: INSERT INTO...RETURNING vs SELECT
Date
Msg-id 20100405071026.GA5610@tux
Whole thread Raw
In response to INSERT INTO...RETURNING vs SELECT  (Cliff Wells <cliff@develix.com>)
Responses Re: INSERT INTO...RETURNING vs SELECT
List pgsql-sql
Cliff Wells <cliff@develix.com> wrote:

> As far as I can see, INSERT INTO...RETURNING is semantically equivalent
> to SELECT...FROM with a side-effect, so it seems this construct should
> work.  Can someone shed some light?

Well, at the moment you can't reuse the RETURNING-values, you have to
wait for 9.1, writeable CTE.


Andreas
-- 
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect.                              (Linus Torvalds)
"If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly."   (unknown)
Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe.              N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Cliff Wells
Date:
Subject: INSERT INTO...RETURNING vs SELECT
Next
From: Cliff Wells
Date:
Subject: Re: INSERT INTO...RETURNING vs SELECT