Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql
Date
Msg-id 20100219024030.GA27534@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql  (Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler@timbira.com>)
Responses Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:26:29AM -0200, Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> David Fetter escreveu:
> > OK, I know it's late, but having PL/pgsql on by default has caused
> > an unforeseen need: --require-language.
> > 
> Why? IMHO pg_regress should be used with the same postgres version
> it was built with. So any tests that use --load-language=plpgsql
> should be fixed.  Besides we could  patch pg_regress.c to ignore
> loading plpgsql language into the database (instead of adding
> another parameter -- we already have too many options).

Any external projects will fail on this if they're attempting to
support both pre-9.0 and post-9.0 PostgreSQLs.  David Wheeler has
suggested that we special-case PL/pgsql for 9.0 and greater, as it's
in template0, where those tests are based.

Cheers,
Another David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Christensen
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoiding bad prepared-statement plans.
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: LATERAL