Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 14:59 +0100, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> >> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> >>
> >>> On ons, 2010-01-27 at 11:45 -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
> >>>> Many suggestions in this thread use "Database" interchangeably with
> >>>> "Database Management System". The latter is a little verbose, but
> >>>> "Database System" should be concise enough for a slogan without losing
> >>>> the meaning.
> >>>
> >>> You are completely right that "PostgreSQL" is not a "database", but it's
> >>> tempting to use it in a slogan because it's shorter and more
> >>> recognizable. But "database system" is also not correct, and arguably
> >>> not as short and recognizable. So you'd get the worst of both worlds
> >>> that way.
> >>
> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy/2010-01/msg00053.php
> >>
> >> The Professional Database Solution
> >>
> >> It's missing something yet, but hopefully with some contribution we'd
> >> get there.'
> >
> >
> > The Professionals Database
>
> I like the first one better .. yours implies a certain knowledge level
> required to use ...
Yea, I like "The Professional Database Solution" too.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
