Robert Treat wrote:
> > Now the other approach we could take is that we'll ship *something*
> > on 7 Mar, even if it's less stable than what we've traditionally
> > considered to be beta quality. I don't think that really helps
> > much though; it just means we need more time in beta.
> >
>
> There are three reasons I'd probably be comfortable with that; 1) the CF
> process means we've likely had more eyes on the code going in than in past
> releases.
The reality check is that was had commit-fests for 8.4 development and
8.4.0 had more easily-identified bugs than most of our previous .0
releases which didn't use commit-fests.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
