Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Mihamina Rakotomandimby
Subject Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project
Date
Msg-id 20091221095441.282240d7@pbmiha.malagasy.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project  ("Gauthier, Dave" <dave.gauthier@intel.com>)
Responses Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project  (Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@killerbytes.com>)
List pgsql-general
> "Gauthier, Dave" <dave.gauthier@intel.com> :
> Again, the audience is managers.  Is there an
> impartial,  3rd party evaluation of the 2 DBs out there that
> identifies PG as being more reliable?  It might mention things like
> fewer incidences of corrupt tables/indexes, fewer deamon crashes,
> better recovery after system crashes, etc... ?


I dont know if it's a plus or a minus, but:
http://www.google.com/search?&q=save+mysql+oracle

--
       Architecte Informatique chez Blueline/Gulfsat:
    Administration Systeme, Recherche & Developpement
                +261 34 29 155 34 / +261 33 11 207 36

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project
Next
From: Mihamina Rakotomandimby
Date:
Subject: Re: Server Requirements