-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 01:09:02PM +0000, Greg Stark wrote:
[...]
> In fact, as I only recently found out, one of the design goals of IEEE
> floats was specifically that they sort lexicographically and use every
> bit pattern. So you can alwys get the "next" float by just
> incrementing your float as an 64-bit integer. Yes that raises your
> value by a different amount, and it's still useful.
Didn't know that -- thanks :-)
(and as Andrew Dunstan pointed out off-list: I was wrong with my bold
assertion that one can squeeze infinitely many (arbitrary length)
strings between two given. This is not always the case).
Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFLJ5i+Bcgs9XrR2kYRAqtUAJ0VHeUd7q/+Xr9H+Clbr2E0HVV3mgCdFXZM
/EPDk1B+M2uP6/Lqr50Rv4k=
=XICC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
