New VACUUM FULL still needed? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Takahiro Itagaki
Subject New VACUUM FULL still needed?
Date
Msg-id 20091215111710.0FE1.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Syntax for partitioning  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: New VACUUM FULL still needed?
Re: New VACUUM FULL still needed?
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> wrote:

> I have enough items emerging from HS to keep me busy much longer than I
> thought. I'll run with VF if that's OK, since I have some other related
> changes in that area and it makes sense to understand that code also, if
> OK with you.

Sure. Many users want to see HS.

BTW, New VACUUM FULL patch is waiting for being applied.   https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=202
But I heard HS is attempting to modify VFI in another way or remove it
completely. Do we still need the patch, or reject it and fix VFI in HS?

Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: 黄晓骋
Date:
Subject: 答复: [HACKERS] 答复: questions about concurrency control in Postgresql
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: New VACUUM FULL still needed?