On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:20:45 -0500 Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> > If we do need to do this, perhaps we should change the older parameter
> > to be partition_exclusion.
>
> Yeah, if we do want to do something about this then changing the name of
> the existing GUC would be a lot less work. However, partition_exclusion
> seems to imply that it *only* applies to partitioned tables, which is
> not the case...
It is less coding work - but it will for sure confuse the users.
Bye
-- Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
German PostgreSQL User Group
European PostgreSQL User Group - Board of Directors
Volunteer Regional Contact, Germany - PostgreSQL Project
