On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:05:05 -0800 Josh Berkus wrote:
> Any reason why the idea of coverring the mug with a list of psql
> shortcuts got shot down?
Why psql? Why not the SQL syntax? Why not PG-secific functions? The
latter one would be way more useful for anyone not using psql at all.
You see: there's a broad field which should be coveres, psql is just a
part of it and a small one.
> The vi mug has been very successful for thinkgeek.com ...
It's just an editor.
--
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
German PostgreSQL User Group
European PostgreSQL User Group - Board of Directors
Volunteer Regional Contact, Germany - PostgreSQL Project