Re: UTF8 with BOM support in psql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Itagaki Takahiro
Subject Re: UTF8 with BOM support in psql
Date
Msg-id 20091118133518.A4A8.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: UTF8 with BOM support in psql  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:

> Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
> > I don't want user to check the encoding of scripts before executing --
> > it is far from fail-safe.
> 
> That's what we require in all other cases. Why should UTF8 be special? 

No. I didn't think about UTF-8 nor BOM in that point.
I assumed we are discussing the following line:

> > I'd say we can always throw an error when we find queries that contain
> > multi-byte characters if no prior encoding declaration.

Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Itagaki Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: Syntax for partitioning
Next
From: Itagaki Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: Syntax for partitioning