Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Albert Cervera i Areny
> <albert@nan-tic.com> wrote:
> > A Dijous, 12 de novembre de 2009, Euler Taveira de Oliveira va escriure:
> >> Simon Riggs escreveu:
> >> > So, I
> >> > propose that we simply ignore patches from developers until they have
> >> > done sufficient review to be allowed to develop again.
> >>
> >> Is it really impolite for a first-contributor, no?
> >>
> >
> > I don't think so, as long as it's properly explained.
>
> Personally, I would not propose to impose this rule of first-time
> contributors, or even second-time contributors. But by about patch #3
> I think everyone should be pitching in.
I hate to ask, but how would we enforce this? Do we no longer apply
patches for 3rd-time submitters who have not reviewed? That seems to be
hurting us more than them. Are we prepared to discard valid patches
for this reason?
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
